[PJUG Javamail] Talking about Oracle and Java?

[Drew Kalina]

As the moderator, I kind of like the idea of this format.  I have some ideas
already.  I'd like to have some general categories like the ones mentioned
in this thread for a starting point.  Obviously, there are career,
technical, philosophical, and community types of talking points.

Anyone who has others, voice them in this thread or email me directly for
some pre-meeting brainstorming.

Drew

On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 9:33 AM, Daniel Kranowski <
public.3491.outbound.mail.only at bizalgo.com> wrote:

> All this sounds like a good topic for the November PJUG.  How about a
> moderated roundtable where the audience airs every possible issue, then
> we choose the top ones and discuss them.
>
> - What could go wrong
> - What could go right (never hurts to look on the bright side)
> - Career strategy
>
>
> > Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2010 09:21:24 -0800
> > From: Preston Crawford<preston.crawford at gmail.com>
> > Subject: Re: [PJUG Javamail] Talking about Oracle and Java?
> > To: javamail at pjug.org
> > Message-ID:<4D668DAE-290C-4E0E-A56E-4F19B53DBC35 at gmail.com>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> >
> > Sure there are other JVMs. The difference to me is when the holder of the
> "official" JVM fragments it.
> >
> > Sent from my iPhone
> >
>
> --
>
> Business Algorithms, LLC | http://www.bizalgo.com | (503) 828-1951
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Web Site - http://www.pjug.org/
> Javamail mailing list
> Javamail at pjug.org
> http://www.pjug.org/mailman/listinfo/javamail
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://javac.com/pipermail/javamail/attachments/20101109/27ba4246/attachment-0002.html>